At an Education Week Chat on January 13th, 2012, guests Alan Ginsburg and Andreas Schleicher discussed their opinions on “why international comparisons of academic skill matter and how those comparisons should, or should not, be used to shape policy in U.S. Schools.” According to Ginsburg, Asians limit access to higher levels of education through Gateway tests, while in the U.S., students are given a second chance. Asians look to U.S. students for creativity. However, Ginsburg believes that through better teacher and management reforms, we can bring most of our students up to “acceptable levels of performance.” He also said that the Common Core Standards “were benchmarked against high-performing Asian Countries and should be a real improvement.” Schleicher commented that in the U.S., social background makes a bigger difference in achievement than it does in high achieving countries. He finds that countries in northern Europe and Asia do a much better job than we do of bringing the children of immigrants up to high performance. Schleicher said that high performing countries place greater value on education and teachers. They pay teachers better, give them more time to learn (Singapore, for example, gives 100 hours of in-service a year), offer clear paths for teacher advancement, and provide them with a “work environment conducive for knowledge workers.” Other interesting comments centered on how the U.S. doesn’t seem to have consistent policies because of changing political policies, how high performing countries measure teacher performance (professional and peer judgment, assessment testing, community outreach, etc.) You can read the transcript of the chat by going to Education Week.
Recent Comments